CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER
But, exactly how is the method to obtain this publication CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER Still puzzled? It does not matter. You could enjoy reviewing this publication CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER by online or soft file. Simply download guide CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER in the web link given to go to. You will obtain this CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER by online. After downloading and install, you can save the soft data in your computer or gizmo. So, it will certainly alleviate you to read this book CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER in specific time or location. It might be not sure to delight in reading this book CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking The Story Of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, By ARTHUR C. UNGER, because you have bunches of job. Yet, with this soft file, you could delight in reviewing in the downtime even in the gaps of your works in workplace.
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER
Download Ebook PDF CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER
From the author of: The ABC’s of Custer’s Last Stand: Arrogance, Betrayal, and Cowardice. ISBN 0-912783-38-9, 2004 The Original Handwritten Transcript of the Reno Court of Inquiry ISBN 978-0-615-23576-9, 2008 This work is the product of five years of extensive research, the culmination of which debunks a story that has been held as fact for over 135 years. It clearly establishes Sergeant Daniel A. Kanipe was not a messenger sent back by Lt. Colonel Custer and neither carried nor delivered a message to or for any officer of the 7th United States Cavalry. Upon learning the truth, every battle student will have to revise their theory of how the Battle of the Little Big Horn began, what actions Lt Colonel Custer took in the early stages of the battle, and expurgate from their concept of the battle all the bogus tales told by Sergeant Daniel A. Kanipe. Contained within this book are over 25 letters from Daniel A. Kanipe to Walter Mason Camp and nine photographs of Daniel A. Kanipe and the Little Big Horn Battlefield all of which are believed to be previously unpublished.
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER- Amazon Sales Rank: #1345834 in eBooks
- Published on: 2015-10-08
- Released on: 2015-10-08
- Format: Kindle eBook
Review Most Relevant 7 of 9 people found the following review helpfulPrint the legendBy W. Price on September 20, 2011Format: HardcoverAt the Battle of the Little Big Horn, Sgt. Daniel Kanipe of C Company claimed to have been sent to the rear with a message to hurry the pack train. As Arthur Unger has uncovered, however, everything Kanipe said about his heroic assignment was an invention to cover the fact that the wise sergeant was simply heading away from all those Indians.An interesting up-til-now NON-studied part of a well-studied battleBy justafellow on June 28, 2012Format: Hardcover Verified While I am still mentally digesting much of what I read in Mr. Unger's book, I will say this: I give him much credit for questioning this particular part of the fight which nobody else seemed to question for over 135 years. My own mental jury is still out, but to me personally, the fact that they did NOT have Kanipe testify at the Reno Court of Inquiry and the fact that Kanipe could produce no WRITTEN order to back up his claim are the most damning pieces of evidence. Debunking more myths of Custers Last StandBy Kerry DiCiaccio on October 25, 2011Format: HardcoverExcellent book on yet one more of the myths and false stories that came out of the battle of the Little Big Horn. Very interesting story backed with painstaking research to bring the forth the truth of the story of Sergant Daniel A. Kanipe.Mr. Unger gives us a fact based explanation to shed more light on the events of this ever famous battle.
From the Back Cover From the author of: The ABC's of Custer's Last Stand: Arrogance, Betrayal, and Cowardice. ISBN 0-912783-38-9, 2004 The Original Handwritten Transcript of the Reno Court of Inquiry ISBN 978-0-615-23576-9, 2008 This work is the product of five years of extensive research, the culmination of which debunks a story that has been held as fact for over 135 years. It clearly establishes Sergeant Daniel A. Kanipe was not a messenger sent back by Lt. Colonel Custer and neither carried nor delivered a message to or for any officer of the 7th United States Cavalry. Upon learning the truth, every battle student will have to revise their theory of how the Battle of the Little Big Horn began, what actions Lt Colonel Custer took in the early stages of the battle, and expurgate from their concept of the battle all the bogus tales told by Sergeant Daniel A. Kanipe. Contained within this book are over 25 letters from Daniel A. Kanipe to Walter Mason Camp and nine photographs of Daniel A. Kanipe and the Little Big Horn Battlefield all of which are believed to be previously unpublished.
About the Author Arthur C. "Art" Unger was born in Brooklyn, NY and currently resides with his wife Grace and their two dogs George (a red haired Dachshund) and Libbie (a black haired Chihuahua).He graduated from Brooklyn College, with a BS in Accounting. He worked for American Airlines, Butler Aviation International, and ABC Air Freight, had a private accounting practice, a financial consulting company Arthur C. Unger & Co., and owned a commercial collection agency Central Collections Corporation. He is currently retired.Art belongs to the Little Big Horn Associates, Custer Battlefield Historical & Museum Assn., Inc., and the Custer Battlefield Preservation Committee. The author was one of the foremost private collectors of Custerianna. His collection included a vast library, with many rare first editions, artifacts, autographs, and letters. Unfortunately a substantial part of the collection was destroyed in a catastrophic house fire. His fascination with George Armstrong Custer and the Battle of the Little Big Horn began with a book report he prepared in the fourth grade. He has since spent over fifty years trying to unravel the mystery which shrouds the events that occurred on June 25, 1876. Art Has published two previous works regarding the Battle of the Little Big Horn: The ABC's of Custer's Last Stand: Arrogance, Betrayal and Cowardice, ISBN 0-912783-38-9, 2004 The Original Handwritten Transcript of the Reno Court of Inquiry, ISBN 978-0-615-23576-9, 2008 This will surely be his most controversial and influential book yet, regarding Lt. Colonel George Armstrong Custer and the Battle of the Little Big Horn.
Where to Download CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER
Most helpful customer reviews
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful. Print the legend By W. Price At the Battle of the Little Big Horn, Sgt. Daniel Kanipe of C Company claimed to have been sent to the rear with a message to hurry the pack train. As Arthur Unger has uncovered, however, everything Kanipe said about his heroic assignment was an invention to cover the fact that the wise sergeant was simply heading away from all those Indians.Few historians/writers will take Kanipe seriously again. Unger writes: "The entire story of Sergeant Kanipe is a lie, concocted to get Kanipe out of trouble for being where he should not have been." He adds that Kanipe, rather than serving as messenger, was simply another "straggler/deserter."Unger is a heavy-handed author and absolutely sure of himself, but his argument regarding Kanipe is persuasive.He writes that the fact that Kanipe was not called to testify at the Reno Court of Inquiry, two years after the battle,even though he was still a sergeant in the cavalry, "speaks volumes." Unger believes that the court did not want to "exacerbate the disgrace that befell the Army from the battle with sordid tales of multiple desertions from Custer's command. It was better to let the lie persist and go unexamined than risk the disgrace scrutiny would surely bring."Thanks to Unger's detective work, we can see the myth developing through Kanipe's letters to the first serious LBH researcher, Walter Camp, and interviews Kanipe gave to reporters in the early 1900s. Very possibly, even Kanipe began to believe what he was saying and inventing. Certainly his family did: both his son and his nephew added details to the story, muddying even Kanipe's versions and helping create the myth.Two of Kanipe's quotes ring true. Telling of other C Company soldiers who made it safely back to Reno's command, he added that the enlisted men knew about the desertions but no officers asked. Kanipe said: "No officer would consider talking seriously to an enlisted man, much less take his word for something." Now that sounds right.And it's possible that Kanipe will continue to be quoted as having heard Custer call out, "Boys, hold your horses, there are plenty of them down there for us all." It's possible Kanipe actually heard that, before he headed in the other direction, and it certainly sounds like something Custer would call out.But as for anyone believing again that Tom Custer or anyone else sent Kanipe back to hurry the pack train, that, as they say, is history.Instead, Kanipe becomes just another of the five deserters from C Company who made it back to safety. The story of those five has yet to be written. Maybe Unger will write it.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful. An interesting up-til-now NON-studied part of a well-studied battle By justafellow While I am still mentally digesting much of what I read in Mr. Unger's book, I will say this: I give him much credit for questioning this particular part of the fight which nobody else seemed to question for over 135 years. My own mental jury is still out, but to me personally, the fact that they did NOT have Kanipe testify at the Reno Court of Inquiry and the fact that Kanipe could produce no WRITTEN order to back up his claim are the most damning pieces of evidence. Kanipe's changing his story over time to me is less important. As he aged his memory may have been going dim. I'm still reading so I'm still not sure how the possible de-bunking of Kanipe's story otherwise changes how the other details of the battle should be studied. A very fresh perspective on a little known part of a famous (perhaps the most famous) Indian fight.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful. Debunking more myths of Custers Last Stand By Kerry DiCiaccio Excellent book on yet one more of the myths and false stories that came out of the battle of the Little Big Horn. Very interesting story backed with painstaking research to bring the forth the truth of the story of Sergant Daniel A. Kanipe.Mr. Unger gives us a fact based explanation to shed more light on the events of this ever famous battle.
See all 5 customer reviews... CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGERCUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER PDF
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER iBooks
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER ePub
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER rtf
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER AZW
CUSTER'S FIRST MESSENGER!?: Debunking the Story of Sergent Daniel A. Kanipe, by ARTHUR C. UNGER Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar